Thursday, March 01, 2007
I've been reading this book:
The Power of Persuasion, How We're Bought & Sold lately.
INTRIGUING. ((=
And then I was watching this PBS Frontline, some documentary with a catchy title -
The Merchants of Cool." They are the merchants of cool: creators and sellers of popular culture who have made teenagers the hottest consumer demographic in America. But are they simply reflecting teen desires or have they begun to manufacture those desires in a bid to secure this lucrative market? And have they gone too far in their attempts to reach the hearts--and wallets--of America's youth?
FRONTLINE correspondent Douglas Rushkoff examines the tactics, techniques, and cultural ramifications of these marketing moguls in "The Merchants of Cool." Produced by Barak Goodman and Rachel Dretzin, the program talks with top marketers, media executives and cultural/media critics, and explores the symbiotic relationship between the media and today's teens, as each looks to the other for their identity.
Teenagers are the hottest consumer demographic in America. At 33 million strong, they comprise the largest generation of teens America has ever seen--larger, even, than the much-ballyhooed Baby Boom generation. Last year, America's teens spent $100 billion, while influencing their parents' spending to the tune of another $50 billion.
But marketing to teens isn't as easy as it sounds. Marketers have to find a way to seem real: true to the lives and attitudes of teenagers; in short, to become cool themselves. To that end, they search out the next cool thing and have adopted an almost anthropological approach to studying teens and analyzing their every move as if they were animals in the wild.
Take MTV. Long considered to be the arbiter of teen cool, the late 1990s saw MTV's ratings on the wane. To counter the slide, MTV embarked on a major teen research campaign, the hallmark of which was its "ethnography study"-- visiting teens' homes to view first hand their lives, interests and ask some quite personal questions.
But what lessons do MTV and other companies draw from this exhaustive and expensive study of teenagers' lives? Does it result in a more nuanced portrait of the American teen? In "The Merchants of Cool," FRONTLINE introduces viewers to the "mook" and the "midriff" -- the stock characters that MTV and others have resorted to in order to hook the teen consumer.
The "midriff"--the character pitched at teenage girls, is the highly-sexualized, world-weary sophisticate that increasingly populates television shows such as Dawson's Creek and films such as Cruel Intentions. Even more appealing to marketers is the "midriff's" male counterpart, the "mook." Characterized mainly by his infantile, boorish behavior, the "mook" is a perpetual adolescent: crude, misogynistic--and very, very, angry.But also very lucrative. To appeal to the "mook," MTV has created programs such as Spring Break -- a televised version of teen beach debauchery--as well as a weekly program capitalizing on the current wrestling craze.
"What this system does is it closely studies the young, keeps them under constant surveillance to figure out what will push their buttons," says media critic Mark Crispin Miller. "And it blares it back at them relentlessly and everywhere."
Of course, there is resistance to the commercial machine. FRONTLINE takes viewers to downtown Detroit, where media analyst Rushkoff speaks with teens at a concert by the Detroit-based Insane Clown Posse, purveyors of a genre of music that's become known as "rage rock." When asked to describe what appeals to them about such music, the teens invariably respond that it belongs to them; it hasn't yet been taken and sold back to them at the mall. Full of profanity, violence, and misogyny, rage rock is literally a challenge thrown up to marketers: just try to market this!
But marketers have accepted the challenge: rage rock is now big business. Not only has Insane Clown Posse become mainstream, but much bigger acts like Eminem and Limp Bizkit are breaking sales records and winning industry accolades in the form of Grammy nominations and other mainstream music awards.
In "The Merchants of Cool," correspondent Rushkoff details how MTV and other huge commercial outlets orchestrated the rise of Limp Bizkit--despite the group's objectionable lyrics--and then relentlessly promoted them on-air.
But in doing so, critics ask, is MTV truly reflecting the desires of today's teenagers, or are they stoking a cultural infatuation with music and imagery that glorifies violence and sex as well as antisocial behavior and attitudes?
In today's media-saturated environment, such questions, it seems, are becoming increasingly difficult to answer.
"It's one enclosed feedback loop," Rushkoff says. "Kids' culture and media culture are now one and the same, and it becomes impossible to tell which came first--the anger or the marketing of the anger."
Therein lies the danger of today's teen-driven economy, observers say: As everyone from record promoters to TV executives to movie producers besieges today's teens with pseudo-authentic marketing pitches, teenagers increasingly look to the media to provide them with a ready-made identity predicated on today's version of what's cool. Rather than empowering youngsters, the incessant focus on their wants and desires leaves them adrift in a sea of conflicting marketing messages.
"Kids feel frustrated and lonely today because they are encouraged to feel that way," Miller tells FRONTLINE. "You know, advertising has always sold anxiety and it certainly sells anxiety to the young. It's always telling them that they are not thin enough, they're not pretty enough, they don't have the right friends, or they have no friends...they're losers unless they're cool. But I don't think anybody, deep down, really feels cool enough, ever."
And as more and more teens look to the media to define what they should think and how they should behave, even some cool hunters are no longer sure that their work isn't having a negative impact.
"Even though I work at MTV...I am starting to see the world more like someone who's approaching forty than someone who's twenty," says Brian Graden, the channel's president of programming. "And I can't help but be worried that we are throwing so much at young adults so fast. And that there is no amount of preparation or education or even love that you could give a child to be ready." "
It's really cool and insightful, I love interesting, controversial, revealing, blah blah documentaries. ((=
I mean, I'm a huge consumer of entertainment media and typical teenager by all respects myself.
But I figure there's something inherently different abt my take on mass media and the like, simply because, I'm intrigued by PHILOSOPHY as well BWAHAHA.
Budden maybe I'm really suffering from the mask of invulnerability too.
STILL,
when you are informed about something, know the way it works and the mechanisms it employ and stuff, that does not derive you of the pleasure of consuming them I guess.
It just allows you to appreciate the same things in a radically different perspective,
not necessarily good/ bad.
WHATEVERRR lorrrrr
I figure the 2 stereotypical teens portrayed in the documentary was really telling.
The MOOK:
He's not real, he's a character.
Crude
Loud
Obnoxious
And in ur face
He's the daredevil on jackass who indulge in dignity-defying feats like pool-diving...
Blah blah,
and ta-da the second would be none other than, well, let's call her the mid-riff.
If the mook is arrested in adolescence,
then she is a premature adult.
If he doesn't care what people think of him,
she is consumed by apperances.
If his thing is crudeness,
hers is sex.
The mid-riff really is just a collection of the same old sexual cliches, but repackaged as a new kind of female empowerment.
"I am mid-riff, hear me roar!"
"I am a sexual object but I'm proud of it."And the mid-riff archetype would most definitely be Britney Spears.
It's like the line is blurring between media as a mirror of teenagers' lives,
and teenagers mimicking what they see on TV.
Is there another way out?
Sub-culture perhaps?
But when EVEN subculture gets commercialised MTV-style,
do we really have another exit???
What can I say?
Philosophy and reading is the answer to all this la.
Philosophy is the religion I subscribe to. ((=Because I am a ENTP!!!
T - THINKINGGGGG wahaha.Rather than turn to an invisible God or ancient scriptures,
I'd PREFER to assess, analyze, ponder over, mull about life rationally, logically, systematically, critically.
Because like what Socrates said,
an unexamined life is not worth living.
And I rather be a severely depressed Socrates,
than being a happy ignorant PIGGG (omg is it alright to say this since this is the year of the pig? wahaha).There's an essential line between recognising the BS and ugliness of the world, yet dwelling in it all the same - and being SECURED forever in God's hands.
And I just can't be the latter.
I'm guessing it all burns down to personality and preferences and life experiences and stuff.
As much as there are lots of values and merits in the latter,
for eg. as Pascal puts it you have everything to gain and nothing to lose if you believe in God.
If you believe in God,
and God truly exists - Congrats you get to Heaven.
If you believe in God and he does not exist, well you don't really lose anything because you still found spiritual comfort and blah blah in Him.
But when there are so so so many religions in this world,
which one am I supposed to believe in?
HMMM, that leap of faith is simply impossible for me.
I would believe in the inherent immense potential of humans - that we can achieve almost anything we set our minds to - more than the Divine.
;rock YOU.
7:14 PM
